Tag Archives: elite

Suicidal Ideation


The ongoing reckless demonization of Putin and Russia and ruling class enthusiasm for reviving McCarthyism and the worst excesses of Cold War Russophobia suggests that the decrepitude of the Western elites has now reached the point where they unconsciously desire their own extinction. This latest drive to war, fomented for the most part by ostensible liberals, is ripely overdetermined. In addition to the usual and persistent factors that drive American bellicosity–the need to justify profligate public expenditure on a bloated military/intelligence apparatus, the myth of American exceptionalism and the paranoia it fosters about countries and figures unwilling grovel before it, the illusion of American invulnerability fostered by a combination of technological mastery and geographical insularity–there has been added the pressing need of the neutered “left” to prove that it retains some vestige of testicular function. One of the peculiar phenomena of recent times is the spectacle of female-dominated liberal men compensating for their emasculation by displaying intolerance for “toxic” masculinity. South Park’s PC Principal provides a fictional illustration of this phenomenon.

In Putin, this pathetic anti-macho machismo has found an ideal target. We are witnessing the late fruition of something that started in the ’60s, when baby boomers who had internalized anti-Soviet propaganda along with their mother’s milk redefined left-wing radicalism in expressly anticommunist “countercultural” terms and became the progenitors of today’s “intersectional” pussy-hatted left. Who could have foreseen that Sen. McCarthy would achieve reincarnation as a bespectacled lesbian?

Where will this lead?

If the past is prologue, we are one the eve of World War III. The present drive to war is bipartisan. The only disagreement between American “conservatives” and “liberals” is about target priority. Should the U.S. go to war with Russia? China? Iran? Or all three at the same time.

Until recently, it had seemed as if the cultural, moral, and intellectual decline of the West would proceed as a largely internal process of cretinization. One noted how, with each passing day, the culture became ever more enmeshed in its sentimental lies about … everything. The modern dilapidation of patriarchal authority had progressed to the point where it had completely compromised the process of acculturation and socialization that mitigates infantile narcissism and produces relatively sane adults. The result is that since the ’60s–when the breakdown rapidly accelerated–Western societies have been vanquished by hordes of internally generated barbarians all clamoring to be unquestioningly recognized as uniquely gifted and deserving of mass adulation. The related sophistries of feminism, diversity, and identity fetishism were invented to accommodate the vastly inflated egos of these monstrous, developmentally arrested children.

And accommodate them they have, to the point where Western societies have developed a full-blown allergy to the merest hint of realism. Today, one courts controversy by merely pointing out that the sexes are biologically different. On the right and the left, self-serving ideology has supplanted reality testing and one of its consequences is the tendency common to both sides to seek the cause of internal societal collapse in the malignancy of external agents. This is just as evident in the pussy-hatter belief that Russia robbed Hilary Clinton of her entitled claim to the presidency as it is in Trump’s equally deluded belief that military confrontation and tariffs will restore American global supremacy.

When a country that has squandered untold billions on fruitless military adventures nonetheless evinces an appetite for more, one must conclude that it has succumbed to a death drive. In recent decades, Hollywood has fantasized all manner of cataclysms that might threaten the destruction of the homeland, but in all instances the fictional threat is averted by the intervention of heroes of the human or superhuman kind. What Hollywood cannot imagine is a scenario in which the heroes themselves, seized by madness, destroy themselves and their world. “Evil appears as good in the minds of those whom gods lead to destruction.”

Uncommon


Liberalism is the contemporary form of aristocratic pretension–it’s what the better people are obliged to profess in order to pass themselves off as quality.

The panoply of liberal tropes have one thing in common: the pretense to uncommon moral refinement. Being a liberal consists largely in making a display of your exquisite sensitivity. This is often referred to as virtue-signalling and it is, but it is important to be clear about what precise virtue liberal virtue signalling signals. Invariably, it is the possession of an uncommon sensitivity to the plight of the uncommon, which liberal rhetoric designates as “marginal.” Liberal fervor is at root a fervor to achieve uncommonness, to be recognized as special, as a member of an elite.

Today, the easiest way to achieve this uncommonness is by professing support for the empowerment (phallicization) of women and the disempowerment (castration) of men. The very perversity of this position guarantees its exclusivity. You notice this quality of perverse exclusivity in everything that liberals profess to value, be it food, art, clothes, cars, or beer. Even when liberals admit to liking things that ordinary people like, they make a point of encapsulating their appreciation in irony. The commonest, kitchiest things are rescued from their commonness and consumed uncommonly, in a way that is superior to the way ordinary, dumb mortals consume them.

The paradox of how liberals, who are predominantly white, can profess disdain for white men is resolved if we understand that liberals see themselves as exempted from that debased racial category by virtue of their morally superior sensibility. For liberals, hatred of white man is not self-hatred but a means to achieve elevation above the commoners.

Likewise, the seeming paradox of privileged liberals posing as victims of “patriarchy,” racism, and “heteronormative” prejudice is resolved when we understand that what liberals understand by oppression is their lingering sense of their own phoniness. This is what the peasants have to answer for–that they make liberals feel bad about themselves. The entire liberal project is essentially an attempt to legislate the normalization of phoniness.

The liberal nightmare is that one of these days the commoners will rise up and force their inclusion in political discourse, which to liberals would be tantamount to ravishment. Perhaps this ravishment is something liberals secretly crave, hoping it would free them from the narcissistic prison of their hoity-toity uncommonness. That would explain the liberal obsession with sexual harassment, an obsession that combines an exaggerated estimation of the hysteric’s allure with a covert longing for a rough man to rescue her from her frigid loneliness.